Reformation for the Health of the Population Essay

Population health is an ever progressing branch of medicine that is basically concerned with improving the health of a macrocosm as oppose to the sole health of the individual. Advances in technology continue to improve the honest life expectancy, yet the American health compassionate body is failing to evolve. insurance policy companies routinely collect huge profits, yet a significant fate of the American population remains subject to poor health c be. Reconstructions in academe and at the legislative level are a unavoidableness if there is to be any advancement to our healthcare system and maturation within population health. Medical training has proven to be lacking(p) in teaching students how to care for patients outside of the primary demographic to which they were opened during their studies (Greenlick, p. 2).Future physicians should be trained to better extrapolate the dynamics and modify postulate of the individuals from the populations in which they will be s erving. Having a working sensory faculty of multiple patient populations would allow physicians to better serve that individual and jointly improve the population. Socioeconomic disparities, ethnic variances, regain to proper nutrition, and genetic sensitiveness to particular diseases are a few factors that need be considered to pass on quality care. Reshaping of medical school curriculum to better prepare students to understand the distri justion of disease, the environmental effects on health and disease, and how to interpret the needs of a larger variety of populations should become a priority in medical academia.Reformation is not isolated to any gender, ethnicity, social class, or age group. Health care reform remains a fervid topic amongst the one-percenters, the bottom bracket, and the classes in between. Universal reforms need to be make in outrank to equalize our health care system.Quality care should not be about the bottom line for profit but about respect and conc ern for ones fellow-man. The greatest opponent for reformation tends to come from a small, privileged demographic who is satisfied with the stance quo and rather not pay reasonably higher taxes in give for the poorer population to access adequate health care. Legislation like the inexpensive Care Act is in a sense socializing health care but its ideals are a step in the office direction for successful reformation. Further clarity is needed to determine an take up methodology to make improvements in population health and the barriers that must be overcome for them to succeed (Eggleston, Abstract).Nevertheless, a financially sound method to descent health care for all should be implemented by the government. Millions of Americans are still uninsured or underinsured and taxing the richesy to redistribute wealth and improve health resources for the population could alleviate some of the burden our system is facing. Insuring more Americans will prevent the uninsured from havi ng to use emergency live due to untimely care of preventative disease which ends up creation more costly and ineffective in the long run.Better access to health care for the disadvantaged would improve society on the unhurt as they would be better able to find and to remain levelheaded on their jobs thus becoming more productive contributors to society. In order to improve the quality of life for all, reforms in healthcare practice and academia need to be initiated. There is no room for political virgule and unfounded claims for opposition if there is to be any improvement in the health of the population. Health care should be accepted as an demand human right, not a privilege. Social and financial factors must be eliminated when access to care is assessed in order to improve the health of the population and improve society.