How has Heckerling transformed the first few pages Of 'Emma' to the opening of 'Clueless' ?

By figureing Jane Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the movie ? uninformed?, Heckerling takes tonus of the point that set fool dramatic e really(prenominal)y varyd mingled with the nineteenth and twentieth vitamin C, and compositiony of the determine in Austen?s eon is direct involven as genuinely taboodated comp ard to the determine we now hold up by in raw association. Heckerling has modify the branch a couple of(prenominal)er p progresss of ?Emma? to the prototypal step move of ? uninformed? by adapting the text into a in the altogether medium (book to inject), hearing (adults to teenagers) and context (nineteenth Century, England to twentieth Century, America). By doing this, Heckerling as well as transforms the values, morality and ideals of ?Emma? so that the modern-day hearing female genitalia let on relate to ? uninformed? as they will more in all probability pick up on the ironies and humour comp bed to selection it up in the original text ? Emma?. in time though Heckerling has transform ?Emma? to a more modern text, thither are close to values and themes that sedate remain, much(prenominal) as - relationships, deception, societal kind synthesis, richesiness and love. In the opening of ?clueless?, there is a active-sounding pop-rock medical specialty in the confirmground and very vibrant influence are envisionn. Heckerling does this in the opening to refer a sort of reference as the rapid-paced music and vibrant colours imply a grit of fun, carefree and immaturity, therefore success enoughy establishing to the audience that teenagers is the targeted audience, non adults. Heckerling has modified the source paragraph in ?Emma? with mosaic- same guns of Cher having fun at the beginning of the opening look in ?clueless?. We see shots of Cher and her friends partying, eating, shopping and driving. In all of the shots, Cher is forevery in the sum or by herself - in short, all the guardianship is a ssure at her. Also, the melody, ?Kids of Am! erica?, habituated along with the collage of shots straight creates irony as the source someer opening guessings all contradicts the song which is intimately and ordinary Ameri faeces blow?s purport. The fast television television television camera movement suggests that the camera is hand-held and looks resembling as if Cher is the one moving it with her voiceover, she is pictureing us ?her reality?. Heckerling?s ?clueless? looks a modern setting. As the song begins to fade out, we adjudge Cher?s voiceover and she comments on how the collage of shots looks like a ?Noxzema commercial? to us to begin with stating, ?? provided seriously, I actually sire a WAY normal musical note for a teenage girl. I mean- I get up, I brush my teeth and I pick out my drop dead c caboodlehes!?. Again, this creates irony and humour as we see her picking her school clothes using a computer to lucifer her clothes for her. By doing this, Heckerling is indeed showing that Cher is ?? handsome? and bighearted?, ??counted to unite some of the top hat blessings of existence? and ??lived?in a arena with very little to distress or stand by her?. Heckerling has to a fault showed the audience that Cher, like Emma, is problematic at equip-making as the words ?mis-match? appears on the computer es show when she was act to match an outfit. In ?Emma?, Austen describes the upbringing of Emma and how her upbringing has helped modeling her current reputation in the beginning of the novel - her m other(a) died when she was of an early age and her father flush toilet?t say ?no? to her as he tidy sum see no wrong in Emma, therefore spoiling her. With much(prenominal) sorry upgradeal guidance, Emma gets as well as much of her own port and can never withdraw wrongly of herself and her actions. Heckerling has also alter this part of the text - Cher?s mum died when she was a baby from a liposuction routine and, flush though her dad can say ?no? to her in ?Cl ueless?, he mollify spoils her. Due to the poor pare! nt guidance, Cher and Emma both live in their humanity of denial, refuse the do it the world impertinent theirs? and they both can?t seem to realise that they have the force to harm the throng nigh them. The notwithstanding difference amid Emma and Cher, apart from their names, is how they react to received situations - Cher reacts more like an ?airhead? turn Emma reacts stub naturally and arrogantly. In ?Clueless?, Cher?s dad has a completely diametric eccentric mortal compared to Mr. Woodhouse- he is a litigator. By Cher?s dad having a completely incompatible personality, Heckerling shows a change of context and values- in ?Emma?, Mr. Woodhouse is a at long last consider man with wealth and power, back then in the nineteenth degree Celsius, the only way to have power and wealth while lifelessness universe respected was to be born in a rich and puissant family in the first place. Cher?s dad on the other hand, worked to earn his gold and status, and he exempt holds power. Apart from her parents, her governess, run Taylor/Mrs Weston, also fails to mighty rent her as she sees Emma more as a runnel and, like her dad, perfect. In ?Clueless? there is no reference work equal to ?Mrs Weston?, but Cher?s best friend Dionne comes close. Even though she?s Cher?s best friend, she doesn?t comport her or tell her what to do, she right goes with Cher?s flow and provided puts up with her like Mrs Weston, Heckerling shows the audience this in the burst where Cher claimed to have ?totally paused? at the stop sign. Also, by Heckerling casting an black to play as a loaded character, it reflects on the tractability of races in the twentieth degree centigrade societal context. Heckerling also shows how frequentity has congest so important that the social structure has become very flexible. Climbing up the social ladder, which was very un parking lot in the 19th century, has become a normal affair as a few horizons in ?Clueless? shows tha t it is practicable through intellect or beauty (wea! lth still contributes a walloping cypher) to climb up the social ladder. These values are contrasted with Harriet/ Thai be saved from gypsies/ the hooligans- only Tai gos up the social structure in ?Clueless? while no-one reacts the Harriet?s incident with the gypsies in ?Emma?, this shows the rigidness of Emmas society of how only coin and marriage can make one rise up the hierarchy while in ?Clueless?, cosmos the intimately talked about will make you rise up the social ladder. Straight after being saved from Christian, Tai is positioned in the centre of the frame in the next scene, this shows that the attention is no focused on Cher and proves the social ladder of the 20th century is very flexible, as people can become popular and not be popular very quickly. later on leaving Dionne to argue with her boyfriend, Cher questions why her best friend is geologic dating a high school boy before stating that high school boys are like dogs that slobbers and need perfect(a) car e. This scene is a parallel to chapter 10 in ?Emma? where Emma has a preaching with Harriet about her views of marriage. Heckerling has replaced marriage with dating in ?Clueless? as 16 year olds in the 20th century put on?t talk or occupy themselves with marriage and this points out the values of the 20th century of teenagers believe that everyone should ?pair up?. Heckerling has also changed the social context in ?Clueless?, in the way where Cher is allowed to be around boys and go out without constant supervision, unlike Emma who has to walk with either a governess, an older and cartel man, or a campaign. Cher is also being educated in a school, whereas back in the 19th century, weren?t allowed to do this. And in ?Clueless? ,it is socially gratifying to be angiotensin converting enzyme or a homosexual in Cher?s world, but this is almost unheard and greatly disapproved of in Emma?s society of 19th century, England. In ?Clueless?, Heckerling explores the present views regard ing marriage and the manipulation of women, and also! how these roles have changed dramatically since Austens time. Heckerling shows that like a shot everyone has the freedom to patch up their destiny and become whoever they valued to be and marriage isn?t a crucial factor in what a person wanted to be, but in the 19th century, people ( peculiarly women who werent in Emmas position of being private and being very slopped and powerful) were forced to marry as it was the only to live a good life and be respected in their society. Cher?s dad, Mel, also shows that shows that being conjoin in todays society is no different that being single, as he has power and emits a powerful aura, this is seen through the first establishing shot of him how there?s a back shot of him with his whole body woof most of the screen. This shows that he holds a large presence in this world, and his body language implies the said(prenominal) - he uses two hands to open the door showing he need to use the whole entrance. Heckerling uses Lucy?s reaction to show how fearsome he is. He also quotes ?You decouple wives, not children!?, this implies that he knows divorce is quite common and not such a big deal.

So, even though hes not married, hes still powerful because he works very hard at his job and thats how people in Chers time, acquire respect and wealth. The debating scene in ?Clueless? enforces the fact that Cher/Emma knows nothing that goes on outside of ?their world?. In this scene, we also see that Cher thinks her pointless and off-topic semipolitical speech about the Haitians is excellent, this idea is enforced by her cocksure facial expressions in a close- up shot. When we compare this scene with the scene in! ?Emma?, the omit of social charity seen when she insults Miss Bates, we can see Heckerling has transformed the value of charity not just between social classes, but different cultures. Just as Emma can?t realise the faintness in the differences between people of different social rank, which changes how they react to one another, Cher can?t encompass the subtle and complex political forces which go on the Haitians from coming to America. In ?Emma?, Mr. Knightley is one of the few people who can see Emma?s faults and told them to her. twit is the equal of Mr. Knightly in ?Clueless? - he can find faults in Cher and tell it like it is to her without hesitation. razz is similarly presented as Cher?s guide in the film as being only of the few characters with common sense in a world sound of very facile values, as he tells Cher jokingly, ?If I ever saw you do anything which wasnt 90% selfish, Id die of shock.?. Joshis presented as a nerd, instead of an ?ideal? social figure for a m an (unlike Mr. Knightley). This show the changes in values from Austens time to the present as Heckerling claims that there is no longer an ?ideal? person to be, as it is our personal morals which shape us as worthwhile individuals. We can see Josh?s watchful eye on Cher during the Lucy scene, the camera pans across the kitchen to see Cher, undeliberate, insulting Lucy and then we see Josh already being there, like hes watch over Cher and trying to guide her, like Knightley to become a better person. both(prenominal) Knightley and Josh are the catalyst for Emmas and Chers change. Cher quotes ??I feel infertile and out of control, which I really hate?? when she couldn?t treat her grades with Mr Hall like the other teachers. Like Cher, Emma also hates being powerless and out of control. Heckerling has also shown a change in values when Cher needed to ?find sanctuary in a place to regather her thoughts and replenish her strength?. The shopping center was seen more of a sanctuary an d a place to vacate a person?s spirit, not a church.! This implies that the 20th century is somewhat more materialistic and superficial than the 19th century. This scene enforces the idea that in the 20th century, Beverly hills was a world operate by commercial considerations and worshipful of materialism. In the modern setting, ?Clueless? appropriately is dominated by images of the excess and overindulgent, a world driven by money and status. Essentially, it is like a little version of American society of that time. Heckerling has transformed the first few pages of Emma success climby by using techniques (such as camera shots and angles, music, dialogue, etc) and fetching in consideration how values have greatly changed in the period between the 19th and 20th century, especially the values of marriage, social structure and the role of women. Even though the values have changed, Heckerling shows us that there are still common things in the 20th century and Austen times, this is shown through the themes that Heckerling has inserted in opening of ?Clueless? that are the same of the ones in ?Emma? (themes such as - relationships, women, wealth, vanity and distortion of vision). Even though Heckerling has changed/ neutered a few thing to match the context setting, the composition dapple still seems to remain the same. Heckerling has successfully transformed the first few pages of Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the opening scene of ?Clueless? by changing the context so that it will have the same affect on the 20th century audience as ?Emma? did with the 19th audience. BIBLIOGRAPHY*http://community.boredofstudies.org/324/module-comparative-study-texts-context/65427/faq-transformations-emma-clueless.html If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper